Lilia
I. Bartolome’s article “Beyond the Methods Fetish: Toward a Humanizing
Pedagogy” recommends teachers to work on being more understanding with cultural
differences between themselves and their over-looked students. Teaching technique is important, yes, yet it needs to be supplemented
with better understanding of kids who are from different backgrounds.
Bartolome
writes that being an effective teacher includes the ability to have students
connect new information with prior experiences. The only way they will be able to access the material is to make personal connections to the material (much like us teachers
reading this article for class!).
I’d come across this idea before, linking students’ interest to the
learning at hand, although it had never occurred to me that you need to
consider not only what pop culture they may connect to, but also the other
factors Bartolome mentions. In my
experiences, race has not played a huge part in the schools I’ve taught at, but
class has, and I was able to connect to the article through this difference
found at the schools I’ve worked at.
I
haven’t noticed any teaching techniques that I’ve tried to use to modify
towards kids from more working class backgrounds (compared to the white collar
kids), although I did notice that I try to treat them a little differently when
I interact with them when I’m not teaching them, like when we’re chatting about
the weekend or what’s going on with their family. I do try to reach out to those kids more on a mentoring
level. I should now extend that
idea to my learning methods, something I hadn’t considered.
The
best way for me to compare the ideas behind this article is to compare the
themes to a recent issue I had in one of my classes. I’m currently teaching a unit on Sherlock Holmes in my
Mystery Stories class. Part of the
curriculum calls for watching an episode of one of the several Sherlock Holmes
TV series out there. Last year, we
watched one clip from the classic British series from the 1980s. The kids were bored to tears, unable to
connect to it, and I’ve been attempting to try to find something more
interesting/connecting to them.
Luckily, the BBC has a much more modern series, and I’ve been able to
pull from that.
The
new series is an improvement because it uses technology to enhance and update
the series. They still use the
same standards found in the 1890s stories, yet they have reflected on the
changed culture in order to keep it relevant. Dr. Watson reports on Holmes’ adventures through his blog, and they use laptops, GPS, and camera phones to solve cases.
It’s
similar to the idea that we need to discover ways to connect with kids from
other backgrounds, always updating our methods, while sticking to our backbone
methods. Knowing what are good
teaching methods is only one layer to being a good teacher. You must be aware of how some of the
information may be coming across to a few of the students in the room, even if
they come from a background you aren’t familiar with, like the native Hawaiins
who typically learned in their families through ‘talk story.’ If you are unfamiliar with their background, it would be
good to learn from it, not only to be a good teacher, but a more well-rounded
person. Understanding the
historical specificities of their culture and how the school and town have
responded to it can be important to make them connection whatever you are
trying to teach. Teachers should
constantly reflect on their ideas and methods, even if only a couple students
are reached.
A great example of this idea reminded me of an article I read about a teacher in a tough, Katrina-destroyedschool in New Orleans. The white
teacher was working primarily with poor black kids who were obsessed with Lil
Wayne. Instead of ignoring the
music, the teacher dove into the phenomenon, and was able to connect with the
kids and the city by adapting to their experiences. Kids wrote essays about the rapper and made references to
his lyrics as answers to questions.
It appears the teacher was able to make stronger bonds with his troubled
students, visiting them at their homes and when they were hospitalized from gun
shot wounds. The music of the time allowed the teacher to understand what was going on much more with the students.
Overall,
Bartolome seems to argue to be self-aware of the choices we make in our
classrooms. There are no sacred
cows. We can always improve. Don’t put on blinders and try to keep
an open mind. Be a static, living, breathing teacher, not a cemented in your ways cliche.
Corey, I think it is great that you changed your teaching based on the fact that the students were losing interest! That's great!
ReplyDelete